Quantcast
Channel: Co.Labs
Viewing all 36575 articles
Browse latest View live

Train yourself to adopt these habits in 2019

$
0
0

Becoming a more valued and respected employee often boils down to changing some of your personal behavior. If you want your career to move in a positive direction during the coming year, here are a few key habits to get into.

1. Maintain a tidy desk

The less physical clutter you have around you, the easier it’ll be for you to do your job. A messy workspace can not only interfere with your productivity, but it can also make you look disorganized to others. Rather than get a reputation for being a slob, figure out some sort of filing system that allows you to retain key documents without having them pile up all over your desk. At the same time, organize your electronics so they’re not in one another’s way. And keep personal items, like photos and knickknacks, to a minimum so they don’t occupy precious desktop real estate.

2. Be on time

Whether you’re talking about a meeting, a project deadline, or the simple act of getting to the office, being on time consistently shows that you have your act together and value other people’s time and schedules. If you’re the person who tends to show up just a few minutes after your peers have settled in, or barge into conference rooms mid-presentation, pledge to change your ways in the coming year. Set calendar reminders for meetings so you get a 15-minute heads-up before they begin. Better yet, block off those 15 minutes as travel time to and from conference rooms. Similarly, play around with project management software so you stay on top of deadlines. And for the love of timeliness, set your alarm 20 minutes earlier in the morning to allow for travel mishaps and the like.

3. Volunteer

Many managers find that it’s a struggle to get workers to volunteer for new projects or tasks that are technically above and beyond the call of duty. Therefore, if you get into the habit of volunteering, you’ll gain your boss’s continuous appreciation. At the same time, you’ll send the message that you’re a team player and that you’re not afraid to step outside your comfort zone. And that’s a good way to put yourself on the path to a promotion.

4. Ignore your personal mobile device

There may be nothing less professional than getting caught checking your text messages at the very moment your boss happens to pass by your desk. The more time you spend on your mobile phone, the less productive you’re apt to be, and the more the folks around you will notice. Instead of damaging your career for the purpose of staying just a bit more connected socially, turn off your phone during the day and bust it out during your lunch break or when you step out for your afternoon coffee run. If you give your closest friends and family members a work number to call you on, you’ll still be reachable during the day for true emergencies. But this way, you won’t get sidetracked every time a buddy wants to make dinner plans.

5. Network within the company

You probably know that it’s important to network with people outside of your company, but networking internally is just as important. The more relationships you build at your current job, the more options for career advancement you’ll have, and the more protection you’ll buy yourself should your company eventually need to downsize–if you know a lot of different managers within the company, one or two might have an opening if your team winds up on the chopping block.

The right set of workplace habits could spell the difference between advancing your career over the next 12 months or closing out 2019 in the same place you started. Learn to uphold these practices, and you’ll be well positioned to succeed in the upcoming year.


This article originally appeared on The Motley Fool and is reprinted with permission. 

More from The Motley Fool:


Here’s why we need way more women in healthcare leadership

$
0
0

Women are the primary healthcare decision makers, often labeled the “chief medical officer” of their homes and beyond. In fact, they make 80% of all buying and usage decisions. Not to mention, they also constitute over 70% of the healthcare workforce.

And yet women are sorely underrepresented in healthcare leadership. They make up only 30% of C-suite executives and 13% of CEOs, according to a new report by global management consulting firm Oliver Wyman. On average, it takes women three to five years longer to reach CEO status in the healthcare field.

Generally, there’s less gender diversity at the top executive level, where dominant male perceptions and associated biases take root. Instead, women often serve in technical expert roles reporting to the CEO, such as chief human resources officer, chief legal officer, or chief information officer, “where technical expertise supersedes intangible qualities,” writes Oliver Wyman.

As expected, it’s a great loss of input for those who have direct and intimate knowledge of the industry’s pain points. So what exactly is holding women back in this field?

[Image: courtesy of Oliver Wyman]
Oliver Wyman consultants analyzed the career paths of 112 healthcare industry CEOs and spoke with more than 75 individuals (both men and women) to better understand the dynamics at play. They identified several patterns. For instance:

  • It’s harder for women to achieve the same level of implicit trust in male-dominated workplaces.
  • Women are less likely to self-promote.
  • Women lack a robust number of female mentors and sizable professional network.
  • Long-held biases as to what constitutes “leadership” hold women back.

“Many men automatically give trust and respect to a man, then take it away. Women have to earn trust and respect to begin with,” one anonymous female CEO said in the report. “I don’t think it’s conscious.”

Gender parity doesn’t affect just healthcare leaders, but healthcare founders as well. While health-focused femtech companies raised over $1.1 billion in 2017, reports CB Insights, female-led startups are still widely underrepresented: Only 9% of health tech businesses are founded by women, and women make up about 11% of health-tech partners.

Representation matters

Representation affects research and funding, as numerous startup founders in the space attest. If VCs can’t personally relate to a health issue, they’re less inclined to take interest. It’s why you’ll find numerous companies devoted to erectile dysfunction or male hair loss, while fertility startups might still struggle for funding.

“I’ve heard the same story over and over of male investors who did not really understand the problem well enough to get excited about a company,” Halle Tecco, investor and founder emeritus of Rock Health, a seed fund investing in digital health startups, previously told Fast Company.“And the few women and doctors that there are [in this sector] are spread so thin because they’re overwhelmed with the amount of opportunity.”

There are other issues at play, including the medical community’s legacy of failing to meet women’s health issues, either by doctors dismissing or minimizing patients’ claims, a historic unease of discussing “taboo” subjects like sexual health, or simply lacking an interest in diseases and chronic conditions that disproportionately affect women. Keep in mind: Women weren’t included in clinical trials for new drugs until 1993.

Last year, Colette Courtion, founder of vaginal device company Joylux, recalled the difficulties of selling Silicon Valley on the importance of female sexual wellness. This, despite the fact that one-third of all women suffer from one or more pelvic floor disorders, and that the U.S. sexual wellness market is expected to reach $8.8 billion by 2025.

“The question I get a lot from investors and people that I brought into the company after I founded it is: Why hasn’t this been done before?” Courtion told Fast Company at the time. Her response was that women shied away from freely discussing such an intimate issue, thereby enforcing its hidden status.

Tecco predicts the women’s health tech sector will witness more progress, though she concedes it’s partially because overall digital healthcare is growing, and that “women’s health is an area that has been traditionally neglected comparatively, so there has been some catching up.”

Tammy Sun, founder of Carrot Fertility, which works closely with employers to offer affordable and customizable fertility care benefit programs, sees the tide slowly but surely shifting. When Sun first began to pitch her startup to VCs in 2016, she saw little enthusiasm and little understanding of “even what the problem was,” she toldFast Company. Today, “you’re seeing the conversation change . . . it has now become evident to the world that [a female issue like fertility] is something that matters to lot of people.”

Diversity, of course, is well within a company’s best interest: A new study found that Fortune 500 companies with the highest representation of women on their top management teams experience better financial performance than companies with the lowest women’s representation. Seeing as how by 2040, the world will spend $25 trillion every year on healthcare–150% increase since 2014–let’s hope the industry takes best hiring (and promoting) practices more seriously. The market simply can’t afford to leave out women any longer.

These 5 travel destinations are fighting back against the “Instagram Effect”

$
0
0

Travel these days involves exploring new destinations, eating new foods, making memories, and dodging tourists as they try to snap that perfect Instagram photo. Instagram is great, but when Instagrammability becomes the No. 1 motivation for booking a holiday, and hotels start offering Instagram butlers, it can lead to over-tourism (a runner-up for word of the year!), dangerously crowded conditions, people making terrible choices to get a good shot, and a glut of articles about how Instagram is ruining travel.

As the Instagram Effect continues into 2019, destinations are coming up with ways to fight back–and fight off the teeming hoards of selfie-stick-wielding visitors. Photogenic destinations like Barcelona, Amsterdam, Cinque Terre, and Santorini are starting to limit how and when tourists visit in hopes of preserving the landmarks for the future.

Here are five destinations fighting the Instagram Effect:

Isle of Skye, Scotland

Traveling Instagram influencers love snapping photos of the Isle of Skye’s fairy pools, the sunset over Elgol, and the rocky Old Man of Storr. The tiny island’s infrastructure can’t handle the traffic, leading to crowds, traffic jams, and misbehaving tourists. In 2017, local police on the Inner Hebridean island were warning people not to come if they didn’t have accommodation booked.

View this post on Instagram

???????? ????:@ross.dickie #TheLensBible

A post shared by LENSbible (@lensbible) on

Dubrovnik, Croatia

Thanks to Game of Thrones, the city’s Old Town has been swamped with tourists snapping selfies in King’s Landing. To combat the crowds, the city has limited the number of cruise ships that can dock and the number of visitors that can visit. In 2017, Dubrovnik limited the number of daily visitors to 8,000, monitored by security cameras, and new regulations expected to roll out in 2019 could halve that amount.

Skellig Michael, Ireland

Luke Skywalker’s retreat in Star Wars: The Force Awakens has become an increasingly popular tourist destination–almost 17,000 visitors came in 2017. Now, the UNESCO World Heritage Site allows no more than 180 tourists per day, and has been known to close to tourists to let nature have its way.

Mallorca, Spain

Over-tourism on the Balearic island led to a “summer of action” where campaigners vandalized hotels, demonstrated at the airport, and tagged graffiti proclaiming that “tourism kills the city.” The government responded by doubling the tourist tax to €4 ($4.64) per person per day, the Telegraph reports. It also cracked down on Airbnb and other short-term vacation rentals, “banning everything except those in detached homes that are neither on public land nor in a region near an airport,” per CN Traveler.

Machu Picchu

In 2015, the Peruvian government announced its five-year, $43.7 million plan to protect the ruins, CN Traveler reports. In 2017, they started limiting tourists to two timed entries each day, requiring they be aided by an approved guide, and restricting them to specific trails through the ruins. Only 5,000 tickets are available each day, more than twice the number suggested by UNESCO, but the tourist dollars are too good for the country to ignore. This year, they have further limited tourism, with a four-hour time limit and no re-entry allowed.

Watch China’s rover drive around on the dark side of the moon

$
0
0

China’s national space agency made history on January 2 by landing its Chang’e-4 probe on the far side of the moon. The postcards it has sent back so far are pretty nice.

The Chang’e-4 probe is the latest effort by the China National Space Administration to explore the surface of the moon, which started in 2007 with the Chang’e-1 orbiter, followed in 2010 by the Chang’e-2 orbiter, and in 2013 with the Chang’e-3 lander, which successfully touched down on the near side of the moon. State media reports that Chang’e-4’s mission includes “low-frequency radio astronomical observation, surveying the terrain and landforms, detecting the mineral composition and shallow lunar surface structure, and measuring neutron radiation and neutral atoms.”

Onboard the Chang’e-4 was a rover, Yutu-2, and Chang’e-4 sent back some video of the little rover exploring the moon’s surface, near the lander. It’s no Wall-e, but it’s a start.

While you’re here, watch Chang-e 4’s landing on the dark side of the moon, too, in this footage released by the China National Space Administration on Friday. If you start Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon right when you start the video, they totally sync up, man:

Hillary Clinton reminds the world that she warned us

$
0
0

During the third and final presidential debate of the 2016 election cycle, Hillary Clinton called Donald Trump a “puppet.” A few years and one potentially damning New York Times story later, and Clinton is looking pretty savvy. And she has no qualms reminding everyone that she tried to warn us.

Clinton logged into Twitter today with a fiery and succinct tweet that simply read: “Like I said: A puppet.

While it didn’t include the fire emoji or even the emoji of the girl flipping her hair, both of which would have been appropriate, it did include a link to the clip in which Clinton calls Trump a puppet of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump indignantly responds, “You’re the puppet. No, you’re the puppet.”

Clinton wasn’t done, though, noting that Trump would believe Putin over “the military and civilian intelligence officials who are sworn to protect us”–which Trump proved when he sided with Putin over the U.S. intelligence agencies that claimed that Russia interfered in the election.

Before Trump’s closed-door meeting with Putin in Helsinki, Clinton also used her Twitter account to call out the man who is widely believed to have won the electoral vote with a little help from the Kremlin (and Facebook and Instagram). She tweeted, “Great World Cup. Question for President Trump as he meets Putin: Do you know which team you play for?”

And after Trump’s secretive meeting with Putin, where he even kept the translator’s notes, Clinton replied to her own tweet with a sly, “Well, now we know.” At this point, it seems clear that Clinton owns Trump more than Putin does–at least on Twitter.

Big Boi faces backlash for joining Maroon 5 and Travis Scott at Super Bowl 2019

$
0
0

It’s official: Taking the stage for Super Bowl LIII’s halftime performance in Atlanta on February 3 will be Maroon 5, Travis Scott, and Big Boi–a lineup that under normal circumstances wouldn’t raise any eyebrows. But these aren’t normal circumstances.

Since the NFL’s hardline response to Colin Kaepernick’s take-a-knee protests and the litigation that followed, the once highly coveted gig of performing during the Super Bowl halftime show has become highly contentious. Rihanna reportedly turned down the headlining spot in solidarity with Kaepernick, which seems to be a consistent theme with other black artists. Maroon 5 was secured as the headliner in September, but they’ve struggled to find anyone to help fill their set. According to Variety, the band reached out to “more than a half-dozen” acts including Cardi B, Lauryn Hill, Usher, and Nicki Minaj–all of whom said no.

When Travis Scott signed on to perform in December, he was met with backlash from fellow rappers, including Meek Mill and Jay Z, who has reportedly tried to talk Scott out of the gig. Scott has since announced that he only agreed to perform if the NFL joined him in making a $500,000 donation to Van Jones’s social justice nonprofit Dream Corps.

“I back anyone who takes a stand for what they believe in,” Scott said in a statement. “I know being an artist that it’s in my power to inspire. So before confirming the Super Bowl Halftime performance, I made sure to partner with the NFL on this important donation. I am proud to support Dream Corps and the work they do that will hopefully inspire and promote change.”

And now Big Boi finds himself in a similar, if not worse, position as the most recent addition to the halftime roster. Given that the Super Bowl is in Atlanta this year and that Atlanta has long been influential in both rap music and black culture, it’s an odd move for Big Boi (a proud Atlanta native) to sign up for such a controversial slot.

What’s more perplexing is that Andre 3000, Big Boi’s Outkast partner, is apparently among the many names to have said no this year’s halftime show. Even if standing in solidarity with Kaepernick wasn’t a big enough issue for Big Boi to decline such a high-profile gig, any increase in streams or new fans will have to coexist with an inevitable backlash. (He’s already getting criticized on Twitter.) That is, unless he uses the opportunity to make a bold statement. Beyoncé went full Black Panther in 2016, so let’s just hope Big Boi has something similar up his sleeve.

These startups are trying to reduce the massive carbon footprint of concrete

$
0
0

At a concrete plant in San Francisco, the concrete loaded into ready-mix trucks now includes captured CO2. The plant, owned by Central Concrete, a northern California business unit of U.S. Concrete, recently adopted technology from CarbonCure, one of a handful of startups trying to address one of the world’s biggest sources of emissions. The process of making cement, which is used like glue to hold concrete together, is the source of around 8% of the CO2 pumped into the atmosphere globally. If the industry were a country, it would be the third-largest emitter after China and the United States–and as countries like China rapidly build, the problem is also growing.

[Photo: Carboncure]
Central Concrete, which has 12 plants in the Bay Area, had already been working to tackle its carbon footprint before partnering with CarbonCure. “Everything we do, we develop around low carbon mix designs,” says Herb Burton, regional vice president and general manager of U.S. Concrete. By using materials like fly ash in its mixes, for example, the company can cut the amount of cement it needs in half. But the new technology from the startup, which the concrete company now uses at seven of its locations, can help it push the carbon footprint down further.

[Photo: Carboncure]

The process uses liquefied CO2 captured from industrial sites and injects it into a concrete mixer, where the CO2 chemically reacts with calcium to convert it into a mineral. Emissions from another factory that would have otherwise gone into the atmosphere become permanently embedded in the concrete. “We get rid of it forever,” says Christie Gamble, director of sustainability at the Canada-based CarbonCure.

The CO2 makes the concrete stronger, so it’s also possible to use less cement, reducing the carbon footprint further and making the whole process affordable. “Cement is also the most expensive ingredient that goes into concrete,” says Gamble. “So by using less of it, it offsets the costs that are involved in the technology in the process.”

[Photo: Solidia]

The result, she says, is concrete delivered to construction sites that meets performance and quality standards and has the same cost as standard concrete, but a lower footprint. Right now, the carbon reduction is relatively small, at 5%. But the startup, which got new funding from the Bill Gates-led Breakthrough Energy Ventures in September 2018, believes that it can double or triple that reduction. Ultimately, it aims to make concrete carbon neutral.

Another startup, Solidia, says that its system can cut the carbon footprint of concrete by as much as 70%. One of the company’s technologies tweaks the chemistry of making cement to save energy and cut the emissions of that manufacturing process by 30-40%. The other technology uses captured CO2 to help concrete set–a process that usually takes vast quantities of water. For precast concrete, that has a second advantage of making the concrete ready to use in 24 hours, rather than the weeks that it usually takes to harden. (In a separate process, the company also makes use of CO2 in ready-mix concrete on roads and other on-site uses.)

After around a decade of development and tests, the tech is now scaling up commercially. LafargeHolcim, a massive cement and concrete company, is selling to customers in the U.S. and North America. EP Henry, a company that makes paving stones, is launching the technology to thousands of its contractors over the next few weeks. For cement companies, the new process is a comparable cost or less expensive than the conventional process. For concrete companies, it’s lower-cost; companies can save because of the quicker curing time and other factors, such as the fact that the product is a lighter color and requires less pigment. “If you don’t make these guys more money from the beginning, they’re just not going to adopt it, whether it’s sustainable or not,” says Tom Schuler, CEO of Solidia Technologies.

[Photo: Solidia]

It’s challenging, the companies say, to change an industry that has used essentially the same process for the last 200 years. “The biggest challenge and hurdle that we face is that this is something new and innovative in an industry that has been slow to adopt new innovations,” says Gamble. Companies like Central Concrete are outliers; CarbonCure is now in 125 plants in Canada and the U.S., but there are more than 6,500 concrete plants in those countries alone. But change is likely coming.

“They recognize as an industry that they really need to make a change in order to make sure that they’re competitive going forward,” says Schuler. “That’s the key point that we make to our customers, that sustainability is really a question of competitiveness more than anything else. Being resource efficient going forward is going to be critical for companies all over the world.”

[Photo: Solidia]

A few other startups are developing new technologies that also use captured CO2. Researchers at UCLA, for example, recently launched a startup called CO2Concrete with a new technology that the researchers say has a better uptake of CO2 than others on the market. Carbicrete, a startup based in Montreal, replaces cement with steel slag and then cures it with CO2, producing a final product that is carbon-negative.

The building industry is ready for alternatives. “I think other people in the industry are starting to look at sustainability because the market’s always going to drive need, and right now you have an appetite in the market, by progressive owners and progressive architects, to really impact the carbon footprint of the built environment,” says Burton.

Privacy advocates: Dems’ “technological wall” proposal could do “even more harm” than Trump’s wall

$
0
0

After House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested a “technological wall,” with increased electronic scrutiny of border traffic as an alternative to President Trump’s proposed physical wall, the internet freedom group Fight for the Future quickly circulated an online petition against the idea.

Border surveillance, including with drones, and inspection of electronic devices are already too intrusive, the group says.

“Any expansion of these programs at the border will have a profoundly chilling effect on free expression and our basic constitutional rights,” Fight for the Future deputy director Evan Greer says in an email to Fast Company. “We’re particularly concerned about the implementation of untested ‘hot new thing’ technologies like facial recognition and artificial intelligence or algorithmic ‘risk assessment,’ which have frequently been shown to have racial bias built in.”

Such programs could also expand from the borders to track people within the country, she warns.

Pelosi proposed putting in technology to scan cars crossing the border at authorized crossings where, she said in a press conference last week, the majority of illegal drugs entering the country are believed to pass.

Fight for the Future also isn’t in favor of a physical wall at the border, a proposal by Trump that’s also opposed by Congressional Democrats, leading to a standoff that has now become the longest government shutdown in history.

“They’re both terrible ideas that undermine basic human rights,” Greer writes.”That said, there are ways that a ‘technological wall’ and calls for increased surveillance could actually do even more harm over time. Ubiquitous electronic monitoring of individuals, using software to determine how ‘risky’ someone is or whether they should be detained, or using flawed facial recognition programs to target people could impact millions or billions of people. Technology doesn’t stay put–if Democrats make this their main response to Trump’s absurd call for a physical wall, they’ll be actively increasing the demand for this dangerous technology. Anything that’s deployed at the border today could easily be rolled out on the streets of Chicago or Los Angeles tomorrow.”


School communication app Remind blasts Verizon over SMS spam fee

$
0
0

As part of a growing movement to fight digital spam, Verizon is implementing a new fee on platforms it believes are used by spammers to bombard users with indiscriminate texts. While this may seem like a reasonable thing to do to curb businesses from sending SMS messages willy-nilly, this new price structure looks like it may inadvertently harm legitimate text-based companies.

For instance, the educational service Remind–which allows educators to send messages to students–has announced that it will no longer send SMS messages to Verizon users as a result of this new fee. In a blog post published today, the company explained that it has always paid a fee for every text it sends to users, but now Verizon is adding a new fee on top because it considers its messages spam. “The fee will increase our cost of supporting text messaging to at least 11 times our current cost–forcing us to end free Remind text messaging for the more than 7 million students, parents, and educators who have Verizon Wireless as their carrier,” Remind writes.

This is one of many obstacles that smaller text-based companies face as wireless providers try to crack down on third-party services. Late last year, the FCC voted to classify SMS messages as “Title I information service” under the Telecom Act, which essentially granted wireless companies more power with how they handle text messages. Some, at the time, warned that this new classification would make it possible for the service providers to censor text content. Companies like Twilio–which offers internet-based telephone services–feared this move would make it possible for large telcos to block users from receiving texts on the platform. Which is to say that moves like Verizon’s new fee, coupled with the new classification, indicate that text-based services have an uphill battle ahead.

In a statement to Fast Company, Verizon spokesperson Richard J. Young emphasized that schools are not being asked to pay this new fee, and focused on companies like Twilio, which power Remind’s texting functionalities, as the reason for this new structure. “A small fee to Twilio, a for-profit company, is intended to share costs incurred to help protect students, parents and teachers from spam and dangerous text messages over the Verizon network, while reducing fraud,” he wrote. “That very small fee will be charged only to major text messaging aggregation companies such as Remind and Twilio–and not schools, parents or students. If anybody claims you need to pay a text message fee to Verizon, they’re not telling the truth.”

Young went on:

Remind alone sends 1.6 billion text messages a year on the Verizon wireless network through Twilio, and Twilio sends more than 4.5 billion each year. The small fee on Twilio will pay for the work required to contain spam and fraud associated with this service.

Again, there is no Verizon fee to parents or schools. We’re now working through plans with Twilio and Remind so that they will not charge students, parents, educators or schools for this fee.

Remind, however, sees things differently. When Verizon informed it of the price structure change last summer, which focused on every service that uses platforms like Twilio, it tried to reach out to figure out a compromise.

“This fee is being imposed wholesale on the channel Remind uses to relay critical information between teachers, students, and parents,” wrote CEO Brian Grey in an email to Fast Company. “While the channel is also used by marketers and spammers–the intended target of these fees—Remind has been swept up into Verizon’s fight against spam on its network.”

Grey went on, “We’ve urged them to except our traffic from these fees, and it’s unfortunate that they aren’t willing to devise an approach that can avoid disrupting communication between more than 7 million students, parents, and teachers who use our service every day.”

For now, Remind says it will no longer be working with Verizon SMS, meaning a good chunk of its users are in for a change. Online, the company and its supporters have begun using the hashtag “#ReverseTheFee,” which was trending on Twitter earlier today. Educators online who rely on Remind are tagging both Verizon and the hashtag.

Unless Verizon decides to change course, it’s looking like Remind’s educator user base will lose a vital part of the service they rely on. And according to Grey, this will disproportionately impact lower-income users. “Many of Remind’s users don’t own smartphones, can’t afford comprehensive data plans, or don’t have regular home broadband connectivity–which is why SMS text messaging is such a crucial part of what the Remind platform offers,” he wrote.

There’s also the likelihood that Verizon won’t be the only carrier to implement some changes. If that happens, it could upend Remind’s services. Wrote Grey, “If other carriers follow suit, it will severely curtail the ability of schools to stay connected with the most socio-economically disadvantaged families in their communities.”

Though it may seem like a small fee that the platforms should be able to pay, Grey explained that’s not the reality for Remind. “[I]t increases our costs for delivering these messages from thousands of dollars each year into the millions, making continued support unfeasible for our business,” he said. “While Verizon isn’t charging their customers directly, those customers are still paying the price.”

Stop & Shop gets 500 googly eyed robots so humans will know where to clean up

$
0
0

A fleet of 500 robots is heading to your neighborhood grocery store. (We’ll pause for you to get “…and so it begins” out of your system.) If you’ve been known to pick up oatmilk, gluten-free bread, and boxes of Lucky Charms at 500 Giant, Martin’s, and Stop & Shop locations, you may run into a googly-eyed robot named Marty. The new robots with the not-at-all-suspicious name and face aren’t here to steal human jobs, but to alert customers to a cleanup-in-aisle-three situation.

[Photo: courtesy of Retail Business Services]
Thanks to a partnership between Retail Business Services and Badger Technologies, the in-store robots are being used to “identify hazards, such as liquid, powder and bulk food item spills, and provide reporting that enables corrective action,” according to press release. The robots’ ever-watchful eyes (eye?) can help stores mitigate risk caused when someone breaks a jar of Prego (or Ragu) and then someone else walks through it and wipes out in a puddle of marinara. Now the robot can alert people to spills and humans can clean them up, proving that they are definitely still the bosses here.

The deployment of robots at Giant/Martin’s and Stop & Shop is now underway and will continue through the early part of 2019.

7 ways the U.S. government shutdown is impacting the tech sector

$
0
0

Going into the fourth week of the U.S. government shutdown, its impact goes beyond the some 800,000 federal employees who’ve been furloughed. It’s also having a huge impact on the tech sector in myriad ways, from layoffs to Super Bowl ads. Here are seven ways the shutdown is having an impact on the sector:

  1. Some small companies that depend on government contracts are actually laying off employees. Tethers Unlimited, a company outside Seattle that specializes in space technology, laid off 20% of its workforce due to loss of income—it has contracts with NASA and the Pentagon, “but can’t get paid for work performed over the past three months.”
  2. Some tech giants will take a big hit in revenue. Companies like Microsoft, Oracle, and Red Hat depend on huge government contracts (analysts at Morgan Stanley estimate that Oracle gets 15% of its revenue and Microsoft 9% of its revenue from government work). Software companies could really take a hit, especially ForeScout, which is believed to get 28% of its revenue from government agencies.
  3. Delaying the launch of new tech innovations and gadgets. Before new consumer-electronics products can be introduced, several key agencies like the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) need to certify their safety. As a result of the shutdown, everything from the launch of new connected devices to the rollout of next-gen 5G wireless networks is being delayed. Even Super Bowl ads could be affected, since some new smartphones that Verizon or AT&T plan to showcase during the big game need to get FCC approval first.
  4. A key investigation into Facebook’s potential privacy abuses is on hold. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has been probing the social network’s privacy scandals for months and assessing whether it violated a 2011 consent order to protect users’ data. “The key part of any investigation is the information-gathering stage, which is revealing documents and talking to people,” David Vladeck, a former director of the FTC’s consumer protection bureau, told the Washington Post‘s Brian Fung. “It just stops. And it has to stop in an organized way.”
  5. It’s put a hurdle in the way of several highly anticipated IPOs. Because the Securities & Exchange Commission is not working at full capacity, initial public offerings for Uber, Lyft, Pinterest and some biotech firms are being delayed. Neither Uber nor Lyft have received feedback on their applications, reports Bloomberg.
  6. Key consumer protection websites are inaccessibleSome of the most popular government sites are down, including: donotcall.gov, the National Do Not Call Registry; identitytheft.gov, an FTC site where identity theft victims can report such activity; and ftc.gov/complaint, where consumers can log complaints.
  7. Government jobs, which require tech-savvy workers, are looking less attractive. Experts say that the shutdown will make it even harder to hire skilled professionals for government agencies, which is already a challenge due to the high salaries in the private sector.

This bot judges how much you smile during your job interview

$
0
0

Apply for a job at Hilton International and three different computer systems have to approve your application before a human being will look at it. That’s the process Sarah Smart, vice president of global recruitment, outlines as she explains how the hotel chain uses artificial intelligence to weed out thousands applying for work in customer care:

First, an applicant tracking system searches people’s resumes for keywords matching the job description. Next, a chatbot asks them a series of yes or no questions to make sure they meet requirements, like, Do you have internet access for work-from-home positions? The ones who say yes get interviewed. But not by a person: This interview is with a predictive AI application called HireVue.


Related: Moneyball for business: How AI is changing talent management


Founded in 2004, the Salt Lake City company has raised more than $90 million in venture capital investment. “It’s a one-way interview,” says Smart. “The candidate will receive anywhere between five to seven questions that they get a chance to answer.” Hilton and HireVue develop these questions together, but they’re all designed to determine whether you’ll be a friendly worker, an empathetic one, and if you’ll be successful in the role. Applicants record their answers inside HireVue’s video platform, then the algorithm gets to work. It breaks down how many prepositions you use, and whether or not you smile. Chief technology officer Loren Larsen says the tool can examine around 25,000 different data points per video, breaking down your words, your voice, and your face.

“We have to start with what success looks like in the job,” Larsen says, explaining how each candidate’s analysis connects to individual work capability. Take customer service, he continues. “What are the competencies or skills or abilities or traits someone has to have to do well in that job? And then once you identify those, then you start to figure out, ‘Okay, let’s suppose friendliness is a trait.'” And when people are friendly, they smile, so that’s why the system studies candidates’ faces.

But should that smile–and how many times you show it–be what determines whether you get the job?

Hilton says yes. As Smart explains, “It’s a pass/fail.” Since becoming a HireVue client in 2014, 43,000 job seekers have interviewed with the algorithm. Two-thirds–roughly 28,667 people–had their applications rejected without being seen by a single person. (As hers is a corporate role, Smart herself did not go through the system.)

But according to Larsen, that’s not how the technology is really supposed to be used. As a company, he explains, “We’re never saying pass/fail. What we do return is a score that is essentially like your SAT score”–a percentile ranking of how each individual measures against others who applied at around the same time. Because so much data goes into compiling each analysis, no single smile or frown should keep you from getting work; it would just raise or lower your score by a few points. And only 10% to 30% of that score–depending on the employer–comes from facial expressions. The rest is based on the language you use.

Both Smart and Larsen contend that the AI isn’t considering anything a human recruiter wouldn’t, with Smart calling the analyses “more sophisticated than that natural sort of gut instinct feeling” that people get when they interview someone.

“If I walked in and you were interviewing me for a job,” Larsen says, “you’d be paying attention to the same things,” such as, “Are you friendly? Are you a good representation for our brand?” At least with an algorithm, he contends, recruiters work with a larger data set.

Of the 25,000 data points HireVue measures, communications director Cynthia Siemens says most employers don’t analyze them all. Hilton doesn’t look at the same behavioral indicators as Unilever, for example, another HireVue client. “Which data points are included in the finished product depends upon what our testing proves to be relevant to success in a specific job role,” she says, with five industrial-organizational (IO) psychologists overseeing development.

Currently, candidates are not given copies of their results, a feature Larsen hopes to add “in a couple months.”

To the 28,000-plus Hilton applicants rejected without human involvement, these reports may be helpful, especially if they don’t have the same background as existing employees. Asian immigrants, for example, use facial expressions differently than white Americans, which could skew results in the system. Also, HireVue’s language analysis begins with speech-to-text conversion, a technology notorious for misunderstanding Southerners.

Larsen says one of HireVue’s principal goals has always been to remove bias: Through providing a larger behavioral data set than any human recruiter could amass on his or her own, the goal is to take personal prejudice out of the equation. This, he notes, is part of why HireVue recommends clients not use results to make hard cuts like Hilton does.


Related: Can using artificial intelligence make hiring less biased?


“We have to be very, very careful about adverse impacts,” he explains, noting that if a client does eliminate every job applicant who scores below the 90th percentile, for example, “It’s very possible that they would not have enough, let’s say, women or African Americans or Latinos in the pool to have a balanced slate in only that top 10%.”

Smart says, “We’ve developed our profile based on looking at successful candidates inside of Hilton,” which she adds is “incredibly diverse.” As per the company’s 2018 diversity press kit, 69% of its U.S.-based employees are ethnic minorities. In its use of HireVue, Smart says Hilton has “avoided any potential adverse impact that could come from a selection tool that may be biased one way or another.”

For those 43,000 people who have gone through the system, Smart says one positive side effect is that they all found out whether they got the job more quickly: “From a business perspective, HireVue has allowed us to significantly reduce our days to fill, which–when you talk about filling large, large classes of representatives that are working with our guests on a daily basis–is a huge business opportunity for us.” This opportunity isn’t just extended to people the computer rejects.

How to get over fear of the blank page

$
0
0

At some point in our careers, we all come face to face with that ever-paralyzing “Blank Page.” That monster-eyed project you have no clue how to approach or where to begin. As a lifelong designer–visualizing things that haven’t existed before–that ambiguity has littered nearly every project I’ve touched. Like it or not, it’s simply inherent in the creative profession. But I’ve learned that how you handle “fear of the unknown” can define your career.

Years ago, when touch screens were considered cutting edge, my team and I were tasked with designing the interface for an interactive kiosk. We had few, if any, real examples to inform our thinking.

Completely muddled on how to navigate, we started from scratch. Pushing through discomfort, we met in a war room each day—exchanging ideas and learning everything we could about the technology. We used curiosity to inch us forward—piecing together bits and pieces of nothing. Eventually, we were able to pull concrete ideas out of obscurity and create something pretty darn cool.

I’ve used that experience as a model throughout my career to help confront, work through, and brave ambiguity. If you can see the unknown as opportunity—to listen, get curious, research, and think—you can overcome fear, establish vision, lead a team, and inspire the necessary confidence to co-create. Not to mention, gain invaluable conviction in yourself. Here are some tips on how to overcome fear of the blank page:

[Image: FC (illustration), ibworlds/Blendswap (pencil)]

Live in the world you’re designing

Founder Marco Perry of product design firm Pensa admits, “All new projects start with an intimidating blank page, especially with established products that already work well. How can you improve something that’s been designed a thousand times?” To get beyond the blocks, Pensa doubles down on immersive research.

While collaborating with OneDrop to reimagine the diabetic medical experience, Pensa’s design team lived the life of a diabetic for a week—needling their bodies and testing blood multiple times a day. Reinventing a luggage brand, Pensa flight-hopped cheap airlines seeking inspired ways to improve the worst travel experience. And while struggling with ideas for new deck-staining tools, they built an entire deck in their office—complete with boards, balusters, stockade fence, and chaise longue. “It looked like the backyard of Anytown USA, except in a Brooklyn loft office with a whiteboard. That’s where we brainstormed, tested ideas, and hung out until we cracked the problem,” says Perry. “If you’re stuck, it’s because you’re sitting at a desk–go live in the world you’re designing.”

[Image: FC (illustration), ibworlds/Blendswap (pencil)]

Ask “what if” over and over again

Practice being open to even the wackiest ideas. D.C.-based Design Army took “radically open-minded” to the next level when grappling with exorbitant photo-shoot studio fees and travel costs. Founders Pum and Jake Lefebure imagined different “what-if” scenarios and came up with the crazy, yet inspired, idea to build their own photography space–one large enough to rent to other local designers and artists. The egg of an idea evolved into recently launched At Yolk, a 10,000-square-foot creative hub designed to be a testing ground and play space for the D.C. creative community with master classes, fashion and art events, and a massive photography studio. “Good ideas can come from anywhere and might sound nutty at first,” says founder Pum Lefebure. “But imagining ‘what if’ is key.”

[Image: FC (illustration), ibworlds/Blendswap (pencil)]

Difficult client? Go wild

The designers at the social innovation firm Daylight Design, creators of digital experiences like UNICEF Kid Power, admit they often work with clients with fuzzy visions that are difficult to pin down. While building a medical education app to aid patients with chronic health issues, Daylight found themselves stuck in project ambiguity. “We initially assumed we were creating an interactive app and website with everything that entails,” says founder Sven Newman. “But the client kept rejecting designs based on our best judgment as UX professionals.”

So the team stepped back, nixed the website notion, and explored wildly divergent concepts—sketching animated video stories, interactive illustration screens, even a printable worksheet. As a result, they were able to isolate the client’s vision: a website that could be navigated based on drawings and shapes, rather than text. “One of the best breakthrough tools is to kick all preconceptions out the door and visualize a wide range of ideas,” says Newman.

[Image: FC (illustration), ibworlds/Blendswap (pencil)]

If you don’t have constraints, make them up

Navigating the unknown is all about getting iron-clad clear on your purpose. For design firm Noise 13, who was given nearly free rein to brand the tech accessories company Amber & Ash, setting guidelines was crucial to pushing through obscurity. “We were essentially given a blank slate: create a brand, from scratch, in the hyper-competitive market of cell-phone accessories,” says founder Dava Guthmiller. To stay on track, Noise 13 made a detailed plan of attack to give the startup a unique voice inspired by fashion, runway colors, and Pantone chips. “The clearer your goal, the faster a plan will manifest,” Guthmiller says.

[Image: FC (illustration), ibworlds/Blendswap (pencil)]

Begin anywhere

There’s no perfect way to brave the unknown. As famed artist and experimental composer John Cage says, “Begin anywhere.” The act of starting is more important and courageous than anything. First ideas don’t have to be winners–often they aren’t. Eventually you’ll find the right one. But isn’t making something from nothing the whole joy of being a creative? We fill blank slates and empty drawing boards with ideas that allow people to engage with the world differently. Through my years as a designer, I’ve learned that making great work means leaning into obscurity—but not getting stuck there.


Arianna Orland is a creative director, user experience designer, and artist. She is the founder of Paper Jam Press and In/Visible Talks, a design conference on the creative process cofounded with Dava Guthmiller of Noise 13.

Your Netflix subscription is getting a price hike–the biggest one in 12 years

$
0
0

Martin Scorsese movies and Shonda Rhimes mega-deals don’t exactly pay for themselves.

They’re both smart investments, of course, but investments cost money, and the money has to come from somewhere. In order to offset some of Netflix’s exorbitant costs ($13 billion for just 2018, not including an additional $80 million to keep Friends through 2019), the company is about to have its biggest price hike in 12 years.

According to Yahoo! News, Netflix is raising its U.S. prices by 13%-18% over the next few months. (New subscribers will begin at the higher price point starting immediately.) It’s the fourth time the company has raised its prices, and the largest increase overall since Netflix began its streaming service in 2007. (Remember life before streaming was the norm? Remember when DVR was a novelty? Remember appointment television?)

Folks subscribing to the basic streaming package will see their monthly price go up from $8 to $9, while the more popular option that offers high-def streaming on two devices simultaneously will increase from $11 to $13. Sources have not yet confirmed whether The Kominsky Method will improve qualitatively with the rate increase.

Proving as ever that Wall Street works in mysterious ways, as of 10 a.m. on Tuesday morning, Netflix stock is up more than 5% following the price hike news. Go figure.

You know you want to watch the Tappan Zee Bridge explode

$
0
0

The state of our country’s infrastructure has been a political talking point for decades, but usually it’s all talk, no action. Today, there’s going to be a little action. Specifically, they are blowing up New York’s Tappan Zee Bridge.

The controlled demolition of the old Tappan Zee Bridge is scheduled to take place this morning. A series of explosive charges will safely detonate support columns on the bridge’s east anchor span. The pieces of the old structure will fall into nets that are being held up by buoys over the Hudson River , according to New York’s local news outlet ABC 7.

Since everyone loves to start their day with some invigorating ‘splosions, tune in below to watch when, in the words of our president, the Tappan Zee Bridge goes “bye bye.”


This doggie wellness startup raised $49M to help your pup eat, feel, and smell better

$
0
0

With consumers spending $70 billion a year on pets, one startup is finding success in a trend that was more recently confined to their human owners: healthy eating. The Farmer’s Dog, a direct-to-consumer startup that delivers crafted fresh pet food to one’s door, just closed $39 million in Series B financing. It now boasts total funding of $49 million.

The latest round was led by Insight Venture Partners (HelloFresh, Delivery Hero) and includes participation from previous investors such as Shasta Ventures and Forerunner Ventures (Hims/Hers, Dollar Shave Club).

Co-founders of The Farmer’s Dog, Brett Podolsky and Jonathan Regev. [Photo: courtesy of The Farmer’s Dog]
Cofounders Brett Podolsky and Jonathan Regev launched the subscription service in 2015 to disrupt an industry that mostly relies on food-shelf stable, preservative-heavy dry food. Regev, who also serves as CEO, explains that kibble varieties don’t necessarily rob pets of nutrients, but do potentially impact a number of different health concerns, including obesity, lethargy, diabetes, and cancer. Currently, 56% of dogs are classified as obese and canine diabetes increased by 79% since 2006.

“When you look at human food, it’s pretty apparent to us that processed food causes health issues,” Regev tells Fast Company.“But our processed food is typically found in snacks, and now that’s becoming a problem. When you look at pet food, this processed food is being fed to them every single day, every single meal, for their entire life.”

The Farmer’s Dog markets view fresh dog food delivery not as a luxury, but more like common sense, albeit with a personalized touch. The company offers various food plans via a customized profile for each dog based on breed, size, activity level, and sensitivities. Fresh food is then sent in pre-portioned packages within just days of preparation. Weekly subscription prices vary on dog size, but on average, small dogs average $3 a day.

The actual food, which includes whole chunks of fresh ingredients like carrots, turkey, parsnips, chickpeas, broccoli, and spinach, has been tested on humans and is actually safe for owner consumption (if a human should be so inclined). While there is no study showing a direct correlation between traditional dry food and pet medical issues, research has shown that starchy foods cooked at extremely high temperatures produce acrylamide, a chemical that increases risk of cancer.

Meanwhile, a 2002 Purdue University study found that servings of fresh vegetables at least three times a week slowed, and in many cases prevented, the development of certain types of cancer in dogs. Researchers at the University of Illinois concluded that fresh and raw diets do demonstrate a number of pet health benefits.

“Our problem [with dried food] is that it’s being sold as healthy food it’s not,” stresses Regev.

[Photo: courtesy of The Farmer’s Dog]
The Farmer’s Dog doesn’t have any hard stats to prove its product radically affects canine health; Regev instead relies on customer anecdotes about dogs finding new energy or moving with more agility. A strong portion of owners say the food cures a strong “doggie smell” odor and that digestions issues quickly fade away.

“If you can imagine being fed dry food shelf-stable food all your life and finally are having fresh food–it would make sense there would be some changes,” says Regev,” adding, “we don’t really make any claims necessarily.”

The Farmer’s Dog now has millions of customers across the country. The brand originally thought it would resonate more with health-conscious millennials, but even older age groups want to invest in better pet nutrition. That echoes nationwide pet ownership trends: Roughly 85 million families–68% percent of U.S. households–have a pet, according to the 2017-2018 National Pet Owners Survey. Of those, 55% say they worry about filler ingredients in pet food, with obesity topping concerns.

As Fast Company previously reported, consumer concern with pet well-being is fueling an entire “alternative” dog food category dedicated to all-natural, premium, or otherwise superior foods. Between 2007-2016, pet food spending increased 36%, driven by sales of premium brands. Dog food brands with raw claims saw a 68% increase in dollar sales, reports Nielsen.

The Farmer’s Dog has a leg up on many of its competitors by virtue of its fresh food. No matter how “organic” or “natural” dried food claims to be, it’s still processed food aging on a shelf. Then there are the number of pet food recalls and tainted food fiascos that have led many to distrust big kibble brands altogether.

“I really see us as one of the few companies out there that is using direct-to-consumer and the subscription [model] not for the business itself but to create the product that we’re after,” says Regev. “We really could not make this kind of product if it were in retail stores … It would have to be further processed or the food would have to be made six months before it hits customers’ hands.”

With the latest round of funding, The Farmer’s Dog intends to grow its team, with an emphasis on technology, customer service, and infrastructure. A high priority will also be put to marketing and brand awareness. Regev suggests the company is also looking at other products that might benefit from its model.

“Pets used to really be for the kids. Now pets are becoming the kids in a whole new way. Therefore, their place in the household is sort of unprecedented,” Gabby Slome, cofounder and chief experience officer of pet wellness brand Ollie, said in an earlier report on dog food.

Regev agrees that a trend of humanization has taken root in the pet industry, but he doesn’t think it has anything to do with people loving their pets more: Owners have always loved their pets. Now they’re just simply up to date on how best care for their furry friends: “They have more access to information,” he says. “There is a lot more attention paid to health and food has certainly been a part of that.”

These are the 3 components of a great story

$
0
0

I was recently coaching a C-suite executive from a multi-billion-dollar company. He started telling me about his background and told me he was from Mumbai. Having spent time in Mumbai, I asked: “where in Mumbai?”

“From the slums of Mumbai,” he answered, “My mother had me when she was 16. She made me study–in the middle of relentless chaos–she made me study.”

His answer immediately stood out to me for two reasons. One, his mother made a huge difference in his life. Two, in just a few sentences, he encapsulated the elements of telling a great story.

As a speaker (or an audience member who has listened to great speeches), you’re probably familiar with the impact of a great story. As television personality Jason Silva told Fast Company‘s Joe Berkowitz in a 2014 article, “Our humanness is built on the ability to understand ourselves in the context of a story, so we’re basically hardwired for stories.”A great story lures your listeners in and allows them to experience your journey with you in a way that cold hard facts cannot.

A compelling narrative, however, needs to have three elements. So the next time you think about incorporating an anecdote in your speech, make sure that you do these things below:

Build anticipation

If I said to you, “get in my car,” you’ll probably ask me, “Where are we going?”

Think of your speech like a destination. Your audience wants to know where you’re going. The more your listeners can anticipate where you’re going, the more engaged they become.

I bought a kids game, Shark Attack, for Thanksgiving. With a plastic hook, you need to yank the fish out of the shark’s mouth. However, at any moment, the shark’s mouth springs up and chomps. It was hilarious–we knew the shark would bite–but we didn’t know when.

This was a game of anticipation, something that’s crucial in great storytelling. By telling your audience what they can expect up front (but without sharing when it will happen), you build anticipation without giving away too much of your speech.

Share personal experiences

When I asked my client–who’d been an admiral in the navy in wartime–“What was the best moment of your career?” He looked at me, and without pause, he said, “coming home.”

His words hit me. How many times have you been traveling for work, or even exploring for pleasure, but found that the best moment was the feeling you get when you arrive home? What makes that story so compelling is the personal connection. Movies and television rely on strong visual imagery to let you experience a different world, but as a speaker, you have to rely on your authenticity and ability to connect with your listeners. That starts with telling a story that contains personal feelings your audience can identify.

Now, you may feel tempted to repeat a good story you just heard, but you’ll have so much more power as a speaker when you tell your own stories. When you tell someone else’s story, you focus on getting the words right. When you talk about your personal stories, you focus on the experience.

For example, I was so excited to get front-row seats to see Bette Midler. I couldn’t wait to hear her sing “The Rose” to me in the front row. But then she came on stage and began talking. It turns out that I hadn’t read the fine print and she was there to give a speech about her trash project (Park Restoration), not to perform. But once I recovered, I was so amazed at how she could share her experiences so vividly like a great actress and demonstrated that great storytelling is about revealing the feelings that are at the core of the experience–not just in the events.

Keep it short

A good story should be about one minute and 30 seconds to two minutes and 30 seconds max. It’s just like driving, if you take too many detours, you’re likely to get lost.

Similarly, so many speakers add too many details about the characters–their clothes, their backgrounds, their culture, their history, and their ancestry. They leave the audience more confused than engaged because they leave them wondering where all this is going.

Let’s say I told you that I was sitting with my husband, who is a psychologist and also a big fan of Bette Midler, and we had seen Bette Midler perform in New York and we’d paid over $100 per ticket, and that was big dollars back years ago. Would you care about all these details? At best, a little–at worst, not at all.

Think about what you want to hear if you were listening to a person tell their story. Chances are, you won’t be thrilled if they launch into a monologue.

Gillette targets toxic masculinity in a new campaign–but still advertises on Fox News

$
0
0

For the past 30 years, Gillette has boldly stated that it was “The Best a Man Can Get.” Now the brand is challenging its own iconic tagline in a new campaign and initiative: “The Best a Man Can Be.”

Created by the agency Grey, the campaign’s lead ad targets toxic masculinity–a topic also addressed recently by the American Psychological Association, which, for the first time in its 127-year history, issued guidelines for psychologists on how to deal with what they refer to as “traditional masculinity.” The 36-page APA document states that traditional masculinity is psychologically damaging to young boys, and that is intrinsically linked to homophobia, misogyny, and aggression.

In “The Best a Man Can Be,” clips of an executive mansplaining to (and touching) a female colleague, dads excusing bad behavior in boys, and casual sexism in entertainment are interspersed with real news coverage of the #MeToo movement, including actor Terry Crews’s U.S. congressional testimony last year where he stated, “Men need to hold other men accountable.”

“This is an important conversation happening, and as a company that encourages men to be their best, we feel compelled to both address it and take action of our own,” said Pankaj Bhalla, Gillette brand director for North America, in a statement to the Wall Street Journal. “We are taking a realistic look at what’s happening today, and aiming to inspire change by acknowledging that the old saying, ‘Boys Will Be Boys’ is not an excuse.” Predictably, responses to the campaign have been mixed, with conservative rabble rousers seemingly feeling threatened by the ad’s message (thus proving its point). (Others have pointed out Gillette’s opportunism.)

Gillette has also committed to donate $1 million per year for the next three years to nonprofit organizations in the U.S. that are geared toward educating and uplifting men of all ages.

The spirit of the campaign is commendable. But is this really the best Gillette can do?

The spot specifically calls out how unchecked toxic masculinity has led to sexual harassment and assault. It also puts a glaring spotlight on bullying. So why is Procter & Gamble, the parent company of Gillette, still advertising with the likes of Fox News?

The news organization itself has come under fire numerous times for sexual harassment allegations against employees, including former Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes. (In fairness, Fox News is not the only network that has weathered sexual harassment claims.) There is also the damaging rhetoric the network fosters through its coverage of stories like Christine Blasey Ford’s sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, or through shows like Tucker Carlson Tonight, which saw advertisers leave in droves after Carlson said immigrants are making the U.S. “poorer and dirtier and more divided.” Procter & Gamble was not one of the departing advertisers.

Fast Company has reached out to Procter & Gamble for a statement.

According to watchdog group Media Matters, Procter & Gamble was still a top Fox News advertiser in Q4 of 2018–a fact that becomes all the more ironic, considering that the “Best a Man Can Be” spot has actual news clips of anchors calling out the very types of behavior Fox News has been accused of perpetuating.

So if Gillette really wants to be a champion for men doing better, the brand needs to take a hard look at exactly where their money is going.

An earlier version of this story stated that Fox News anchors had been accused of sexual harassment and that Roger Ailes was the owner of Fox News. We have corrected the wording.

8 robots racing to win the delivery wars of 2019

$
0
0

CES 2019 has brought three new automated robot vehicles to an already hotly contested race to get your dinner, groceries, and packages to your home or office desk.

The goal of all these robots is to deliver for what the industry calls the “last mile,” or the distance from a local depot to a final destination. Right now, these routes are covered by humans in cars or vans. This is inefficient–it uses too much energy and worsens congestion. In some cases, for instance on campuses or inside large office complexes, it’s time-consuming and impractical.

Enter delivery robots. These small bots could, in theory, solve many of these “last mile” problems by offering an efficient, quick, and inexpensive way to get your stuff whenever you needed it. This is easier said than done; there are plenty of unanswered questions about how these bots should operate in society. They must be good citizens, respect humans, and do their job as invisibly as possible. All without getting attacked or bursting into flames first.

There’s a competition afoot to build the best delivery bot–and deploy them successfully in the real world. Here are some of the front-runners.

[Image: Segway Robotics]

Segway Loomo Delivery

Meet the Loomo Delivery: a completely autonomous hauling robot debuted last week at CES 2019 by Segway, the personal mobility company (which seems to be doing lots of weird stuff these days).

If the Loomo looks like an office copier, well, that may be because it’s actually designed for use in offices. Segway’s aim here seems to be to own delivery within the many offices in the world that are large enough to need their own automated internal delivery systems to replace their human counterparts. The company says it’s aiming at China’s booming delivery market too, where the “last-mile delivery and takeout services market has been rapidly expanding with an annual growth rate of 30% to 50%.”

The company’s bot uses 4G or Wi-Fi to connect to the cloud to automatically set up map routes, adjust schedules, and be monitored by its human masters in real time. It can deliver a maximum weight of about 110 pounds. The technology that powers the Loomo Delivery bot is already available for preorder–but as a “personal transporter” that hearkens back to the company’s most famous product. The company says that the transporter’s success drove them to the development of Loomo Delivery.

[Image: Anybotics]

Anybotics and Continental

Anybotics and Continental also introduced a new robot delivery system at CES 2019–one that scares the hell out of me after watching Metalhead, the Black Mirror episode about the hunting robo-dog assassin.

The two companies have invented a two-part solution: First, there’s an autonomous delivery van developed by Continental. Then, inside the van, there are robotic dogs developed by Anymal. When it gets to a particular area, the delivery van doors open and the dogs emerge, carrying packages and their destinations in their little AI-powered brains. This solves the problem of the limited range of small delivery bots. By deploying them from a larger vehicle, they can easily reach their destination and get back to the mothership to ride to another destination while recharging.

[Image: Continental AG]
The companies say the robot dogs can carry your stuff on sidewalks, through doors, and up elevators and stairs–all the way to your home or office door. When it gets where it’s supposed to be, it places your package on your doorstep and rings your doorbell. Rest well for now, though: There’s no date for deployment yet.

[Image: Postmates]

Postmates Serve

This cute robot is Serve, a tiny electric beast that can carry up to 50 pounds over a 30-mile radius. According to Postmates–the delivery company looking to replace its costly gig-economy workers with a piece of machinery that never complains–the bot is designed to make people around it feel at ease.

For starters, the LIDAR-powered bot has big humanoid eyes, like Pixar’s cute robot Wall-E. Postmates CEO Bastian Lehmann said in a press note that these eyes are not just decoration: “We have developed a specific rover-human interface so that people understand what rovers are doing at any moment.” Postmates clearly hopes that Serve’s human-centered design will help it avoid running into people or clogging up sidewalks–common issues with delivery bots.

Serve is being deployed in Los Angeles now, but Postmates is planning to extend the service to other  U.S. cities in 2019.

[Image: Marble]

Marble

San Francisco-based Marble–a Most Innovative Company in 2018–is yet another startup that wants to save the earth with energy-efficient delivery robots that have been delivering food through a partnership with Yelp Eat24 in San Francisco since 2017.

Founded in 2015, Marble’s mission is to “help local neighborhood business to compete and stay connected to their customers.” So you can expect these robots to take your local purchases home, rather than having to carry bags yourself. The bots themselves use LIDAR combined with “state-of-the-art 3D mapping and artificial intelligence” to navigate the streets, and offer a larger capacity than most of the other robots.

San Francisco has since tightened regulations on delivery bots, but Marble announced it closed a $10 million round of funding last summer, saying that it plans to expand its technology “beyond food delivery logistics into groceries, retail, pharmacy, and more.”

Boxbot

Oakland-based Boxbot is Toyota AI Ventures’s first investment in the automated delivery space, which gives the company some of the business and auto industry cred that goes with the Toyota brand.  Unfortunately, details about the venture are still slim.

Over email, Boxbot’s CEO and cofounder Austin Oehlerking commented that “unfortunately, [they] haven’t unveiled (yet) the latest version of our self-driving delivery vehicle, so there’s no photo we can share at this time.” He added that the company is “working on a problem that’s much bigger than delivering groceries.” Other than that, we know very little concrete about Boxbot’s plans–except that it was founded by engineers from Tesla and Uber, and it’s very secretive.

[Image: Nuro]

Nuro

Nuro is perhaps the largest last-mile delivery vehicle of the bunch. Created by Google engineers Jiajun Zhu and Dave Ferguson a year ago, it’s a completely automated and battery-powered delivery vehicle. According to its creators, it’s just like any other delivery van–just smaller and much safer than one driven by a human. It can be equipped with both refrigerated and heated compartments as needed, so it may be apt for the delivery of fresh groceries and hot food.

However, since it’s confined to the street, people will have to head out to the van to pick up their packages. There’s no word about when it will hit the streets in real delivery situations, but Nuro claims that it has been testing its low-speed, city-only vans since 2016.

[Photo: Kiwi]

Kiwibot

A small army of Kiwibots is already at work on the UC Berkeley campus, where one recently caught fire due to a hardware malfunction. The company’s bots are relatively tiny and specialize in personal food delivery (the perfect value proposition for college campuses).

The company, which deployed its first bot in 2017, claims they’re 65% faster than human couriers, thanks to their size, AI, and constant speed. It also says that the average delivery time is 27 minutes, with a 4.6 star (out of 5) customer service rating. They require people to go down to the street to pick up their stuff, though it’s easy to imagine this making it easier for the bots on complex college campuses.

[Photo: Starship]

Starship Robots

Starship Robots is a company that launched in San Francisco and Estonia in 2014. When Fast Company covered the company’s small robots in 2015, the company’s business model was to cut down on the cost of human delivery with its small robots, which resemble plastic basket on wheels. In a November 2018 blog post, the company reported that “Starship’s robots are doing real deliveries seven days a week in multiple cities around the world.”

These bots can be summoned with a phone app whenever a user places an order. The robot, as you can see in the video above, will then travel to the pickup location, wait until a human places something in it, and then drive to where the drop-off location, where the other human is waiting for its cake and coffee.

It looks rather fast and easy.

Time will tell which of these startups will win out in the long run, but expect to hear more about this race over the next year. I, for one, welcome our new cake-bearing delivery overlords.

How the era of the remote worker complicates management

$
0
0

New York-based startup Muck Rack is a team of 50 people who can work from home whenever they want. About one-third of the company’s team is based outside New York and therefore, always remote. CEO Greg Galant says he set Muck Rack up to be a completely remote company, meaning that if the startup’s building burned down tomorrow, business would go on as usual the next day.

“My friends always say to me, ‘How do you know if anyone is really working?’ and I always ask them, ‘How do you know if anybody is really working if they are at the office?'” says Galant. “Because the reality is, you can see somebody at their desk and they can stay late, but that doesn’t mean they’re really working.”

As flexibility in the workplace increasingly becomes the most sought-after work arrangement, we see companies scrambling to put a flexibility policy on the books. What ends up happening in the fluid workplace, though, is that workers have more autonomy, which ends up complicating management. After all, how do you manage a team when you don’t know exactly where they are? All of this is further complicated when you consider the diversity of the workforce and the reality that we have five generations working side-by-side who need flexibility for a variety of reasons.

“We expect more of [workers],” says Ed Barrows, managing director at Duke Corporate Education. “We text, email, and communicate globally around the clock. If that is the case for a working environment, you’re going to run into people’s personal lives.”

Of course, all of this change requires managers to manage differently, and the new nature of employment relationships can feel intimidating. However, “When companies are able to do this, they’re really in a position to tap talent,” says Barrows, coauthor of the book Managing Performance in Turbulent Times. Below are steps organizations take to manage remote workers more effectively:

100% buy-in from leadership

In order for a system to work, everyone needs to buy into it, especially upper management. According to Galant, one of the most powerful things a leader can do, if they want a remote culture, is to work remotely themselves.

“That could mean working from home one or two days a week to set the tone and show people it’s possible,” he explains. “If the CEO and the top people in the company always show up in the office five days a week, then you can say you have remote culture all you want, but actions speak louder than words.”

At Muck Rack, employees can work from home whenever they want without having to request permission because doing so would imply that there is “something wrong or inferior about [remote working],” Galant says.

When Agios Pharmaceuticals implemented a flexible work environment, the company got buy-in from management by sharing success stories of how a flex culture makes the biotech better, and how meeting people’s needs help productivity and teams, says Melissa McLaughlin, chief people officer at Agios.

When O’Melveny & Myers LLP introduced flexible options for its staff attorneys, counsels, and associates, the international law firm made sure to include its partners. Mary Ellen Connerty, who leads diversity and inclusion at O’Melveny & Myers, told Fast Company in December 2018 that the company “didn’t want this to be an associates and counsel issue, but a shared issue and go under the bigger umbrella of well-being.”

Being aware of people’s time (especially remote workers)

If managers are adhering to traditional management practices, they’re going to feel anxiety with remote teams. They’re going to want to check in constantly to make sure people are working. But checking in constantly prevents work from getting done.

Robby Macdonell, CEO of RescueTime, says this threat is even more prevalent in a remote work culture because people can’t see that someone has their head down working. You can’t see that they have their headphones in and are in deep concentration.

“That innocent ‘Hey, do you have a minute’ is one of the most dangerous things that can happen,” says Macdonell. “It’s never just a minute. There’s always effort to get back into something.”

Since every employee at RescueTime works remotely, the team relies on communication streams, but having these channels up and running constantly can be disruptive, warns Macdonell, so his team shares their work status in the workflow tool Slack to communicate with one another.

The company is currently experimenting with ways to integrate RescueTime’s time management software into Slack so work statuses can be automatically set. For instance, if RescueTime’s tool picks up that you are working on something at the moment, it can automatically notify colleagues in Slack that they should not message you.

“[Slack] is a good way to see the pulse of your remote team,” says Macdonell, and “see how the interactions are going there even if they’re not work-related.”

Having regular scheduled meetings

One disadvantage of a remote team is that there are no chance meetings that lead to unplanned brainstorming sessions and conversations that lead to innovative, groundbreaking solutions.

So in order to make sure collaborations still occur and employees have the environment they need to further refine or develop the next great idea, RescueTime relies on regularly scheduled meetings.

At Muck Rack, aside from regularly scheduled meetings where colleagues bounce ideas off one another, there is also a regularly scheduled weekly meeting meant to build team morale and culture. In the meeting, everyone shares a “win” they had during the week. It creates a kind of culture, says Galant, and it also informs teams what their colleagues are working on.

Always including a video link to meetings

Having a flexible work culture means it’s always a possibility that someone is working remotely. Don’t wait until after a meeting has started to figure this out. Instead, be mindful of everyone’s time by making sure that a video link is curated for every scheduled meeting.

“One thing we struggled with at first was starting a meeting,” says Galant. “Sometimes you wait until the meetings start, and then you figure out how to connect everybody. It would always be a mess.”

Additionally, a video link means being able to see everyone’s face, which makes a big difference, says Galant, because you get a sense of when somebody wants to jump into a discussion or has a point of view they want to add.

Taking the time to include the big picture

In remote work cultures, it’s easy to get caught up in the logistics–giving people the information they need to carry out a task, then checking back in to discuss the task in more detail at a later date.

What easily gets lost is the big picture–why someone is doing something or carrying out a task. Whether someone is working remotely, freelancing, or is a temporary worker, understanding the meaning behind your work is key to good performance, and it pushes people to go the extra mile.

“The biggest pain point for me is keeping the vision of the company,” says Macdonell, and “driving everybody toward the North Star, keeping that front and center.”

Taking isolation seriously

The lack of social interaction (think: no small talk from running into each other by chance in the office) can get lonely, and eventually, wreak havoc on the body and mind. This is especially dangerous during the colder seasons when people tend to stay indoors more.

“It’s something that can creep up on you because you have this proxy of communication and you are talking to people every day,” explains Macdonell. “Maybe not verbally, sometimes just through typing, but it wears you down after a while.”

Macdonell urges leaders with remote teams to take mental health seriously and commit to reaching out. By nature, humans thrive on social interaction, and the brain is healthy when we have people to interact with regularly.

“If you’re not seeing people face to face, you’re going to miss some cues that somebody is not having a good experience,” says Macdonell, “and we want our employees to have the best work experience that they can. From that standpoint, I want to be aware of those things, but also on a human level, I want to be aware.”

Suffering from loneliness is not an easy thing to communicate for anybody, so the onus is really on team leaders and senior managers to reach out.

“A lot of time, people don’t bring that stuff up because nobody asks,” says Macdonell.

One thing you can do is be up front about why you’re asking. You can say it’s on your mind because the colder months are here and it’s easy to become isolated. Macdonell says it’s been helpful for him to be open and honest with his team when he is starting to feel lonely and to talk about mental health openly. This way, he is communicating with his team that it’s safe and appropriate to bring up these topics.

Being aware of distance bias

Distance bias is the brain’s tendency to think that people who are physically closer are of greater importance or value than those who are further away. It’s essentially out of sight, out of mind. This phenomenon means that remote teams end up feeling alienated.

“It seems to be a problem in decision making and collaboration,” says Macdonell. “You should assume that a dial-in on a conference line is not a seat at the table.”

Defaulting to video chat, or, as a manager, remembering to check-in with your remote team can make the remote experience richer.

“When it comes to talking about the decisions that need to be made, giving input, being in a full, first-class system in equal collaboration, [remote workers are] at a big disadvantage,” says Macdonell. “Awareness is a good first step. Know that that disadvantage exists, and find ways to mitigate it.”

As the nature of our employment relationships continue to change, it’s up to organizations to not only make the necessary changes but also give managers the tools needed for those changes to be successful. For instance, if the new rules require managers to “manage” less and “empower” workers more, what does that look like? And what does that mean for a manager’s day-to-day?

Viewing all 36575 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images